$14 MP3 Player With Built In NES Emulator, But...
By bohus
So what makes this interesting to the retro crowd (besides the fact that I keep it loaded up with old time radio shows and old Sammy Davis Jr. records...)? It packs a surprise function. This $14 no-name has an extra on-screen menu for "Games". I highlighted the joystick icon to be greeted by what is clearly
That signature music came on, so I was looking forward to playing NES games on a $14 cheapie that I could recommend to all of you, but there's a significant problem. There aren't enough buttons to actually play the games. You use the fast-forward and rewind buttons to move left and right (the buttons are on top of each other to make gameplay even more disorienting). No buttons on the player make Mario jump or do anything other than move left and right. As you can imagine, this does curtail one's game selection quite a bit. I can't even think of one game that would be fun this way... Arkanoid maybe?
My guess is that my player is reusing firmware from another (possibly less cheap?) MP3 player that hopefully has more buttons built in. I guess that an NES emulator doesn't pose much of a challenge to modern processors - even the sorts of processor chips they can afford to slap into a cheap MP3 player. Let's remain vigilant, retro readers, for any other cheap electronics harboring an illegitimate 8 bit secret.

Enter the Commodore 65; in many ways like a C64 that went to "11". It
featured a sleek new design, two SID audio chips, a built in 3.5" floppy
drive, better graphics abilities, expansion to 8 megs of RAM, and a
flat bit to rest your coffee on. Some working prototypes were made in
1990-91, and when Commodore was liquidated after their bankruptcy in
'94, some of these machines got out. No one knows exactly how many are
out there; estimates range from 50 to several hundred.
With millions of Commodore 64's sold in the world, it seems like there
could have been interest in an improved version like the 65. The C65
went unreleased not because ol' "chicken lips" (the unfortunate nickname
for Commodore's logo) was too chicken to offer new products, but
because the C65 simply would not have sold in the early 90's. Especially
not at the $300-400 projected price. Sadly the evolutionary C65 will go
down in computing history as another unfortunate casualty of
Commodore's legendary lack of insight.