:-) celebrates 25 years
By James Grahame
Carnegie Mellon Research Professor Scott Fahlman coined the ubiquitous :-) smiley emoticon twenty five years ago, at 11:44am EDT on September 19, 1982. Its sad-faced brother :-( was born mere seconds later. They spread like wildfire throughout BITNET and across university campuses worldwide to become a mainstay of the online lexicon.
Professor Fahlman explains: "By the early 1980’s, the Computer Science community at Carnegie Mellon was making heavy use of online bulletin boards or “bboards”. These were a precursor of today’s newsgroups, and they were an important social mechanism in the department – a place where faculty, staff, and students could discuss the weighty matters of the day on an equal footing.
Given the nature of the community, a good many of the posts were humorous (or attempted humor). The problem was that if someone made a sarcastic remark, a few readers would fail to get the joke, and each of them would post a lengthy diatribe in response.
Various “joke markers” were suggested, and in the midst of that discussion it occurred to me that the character sequence :-) would be an elegant solution – one that could be handled by the ASCII-based computer terminals of the day. So I suggested that. In the same post, I also suggested the use of :-( to indicate that a message was meant to be taken seriously, though that symbol quickly evolved into a marker for displeasure, frustration, or anger.
Fahlman failed to recognize the importance of his idea and didn't bother to keep a copy of the historic message. It remained lost but not forgotten until Mike Jones at CMU successfully retrieved it from an old 9-track backup tape in 2002. It was short, sweet, grammatically incorrect and sparked a revolution in online communication:
The full thread surrounding this fateful message can be found here.
These days it's rare to see a 'pure' version of Fahlman's original emoticon. Many instant messenger and email apps mutilate it into a distracting yellow happy face. Even Microsoft Word doesn't leave it untouched. I miss the days when text was just text. Heck, I miss the days when character set ROMs didn't have enough space for lower case letters. And it wasn't really that long ago...